Travel Rule Standard Development – Highlights from the DARTE Digital Asset Round Table in Stockholm

DARTE Digital Assets Round Table May 25 2026, Estonian House in Stockholm


CryptoSwift co-hosted the DARTE Digital Asset Round Table on 25 May at the Estonian House in Stockholm. Taking place at the side-lines of the Nordic Blockchain Conference 2026, the session gathered more than 30 legal experts and business executives operating at the forefront of the digital asset space. 

The round table agenda focused on three themes: 

  1. Travel Rule standard development and enhanced due diligence, presented by Uve Poom (CryptoSwift); 
  2. When blockchain data becomes inside information, presented by Karola Xenia Kassai (KassaiLaw); 
  3. Prediction markets and MiCAR market abuse rules, presented by Dr. Nina-Luisa Siedler (siedler legal and DAAvern). 

This post summarises the discussion on the Travel Rule topic, while the full report can be accessed here.

From trading assets to powering trade.

Moving digital currency is expanding from trading with speculative assets (e.g. Bitcoin) into real-world payments. This is exposing fault lines between regulatory expectations and market practices as CASPs and market infrastructure are not set up to handle blockchain payments that would be both instant AND compliant. At the DARTE Digital Assets Round Table, our COO Uve Poom mapped out the three systemic issues that impede adoption – and recommendations to solve them.

  1. Interoperability Challenge

Many Travel Rule Service Providers (TRSPs) are currently locked in a battle for network effects, creating data silos. This fragmentation causes unconfirmed messages, violating TFR Recitals 28 and 33, which mandate payer and payee data completeness. Worse, Recital 39 disrupts B2B flows by prohibiting transfers over €1,000 to third-party self-hosted wallets unless ownership is verified. This nearly eliminates the space for legitimate commercial payment use cases.

  1. Data Payload Deficit

The standard Travel Rule payload lacks the fields required for conclusive AML screening (e.g., date of birth, nationality). Without these, compliance teams face a wave of false positives. Furthermore, the absence of a “payment explanation” field makes automated invoice reconciliation complicated and time-consuming for accountants and auditors.

  1. European Technological Sovereignty & DORA Compliance

There is a heated discussion on European technological autonomy taking place in this day and age. Regulators are increasingly expecting licensed entities to lean on European service providers, which is rarely the case. 

In addition to undermining digital sovereignty, relying on non-EU service providers leads to a catch 22 in complying with the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). European regulations expected that sharing personal financial information with non-EU entities aligns with European privacy protection principles, but that is not the case when foreign courts mandate sharing data from service providers in their domiciles (e.g. the U.S. CLOUD Act). 

Recommendations

CryptoSwift tabled three proposals to help the industry forward.

  1. External KYC: CASPs can prompt third parties to verify their data via eID tools, digital identity wallets or basic selfie-based remote ID checks. This solves the validation hurdle and justifies lifting the €1,000 self-hosted restriction.
  1. Enriched Travel Rule Payloads: Expand data standards to allow optional secondary identifiers (DOB, address) to execute accurate sanctions checks without creating database honeypots.
  1. TRSP Whitelisting: Establish regulatory or industry whitelists of TRSPs, focusing on legal and data domicile information as well as Travel Rule protocol interoperability.

Implementing these suggestions would facilitate the adoption of stablecoin payments through actual compliance, regulatory enablement as well as day-to-day application of the technology. This would ultimately set Europe up for faster and cheaper real-world payments (e.g. remittances and B2B) and also unlock benefits stemming for agentic commerce and trading tokenized securities.